Small cities • 2016

Obec Líbeznice

IČO 00240427

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Pavilon prvního stupně základní školy v Líbeznicích
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rozšíření kapacity ZŠ a ZUŠ Líbeznice, II. etapa TĚLOCVIČNA SE ZÁZEMÍM
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení budovy a výměna energetického zdroje – ZŠ Líbeznice
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti obecních budov - Líbeznice
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
„Odstranění překážek dopravní obslužnosti obce Líbeznice“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
9
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Prominecon Cz a.s.
1 35,798,565
Jma Group s.r.o.
1 29,157,904
Stabyt, bytové družstvo v Ústí nad Orlicí
2 14,381,290
Kobla, spol. s r. o.
1 13,764,349
Strabag a.s.
2 8,529,980
Other suppliers 2 4,958,426

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Vícepráce - Odstranění překážek dopravní obslužnosti obce Líbeznice
Dodatečné práce
550,583

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

38%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 33% (3 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 9)