Small cities • 2016

Město Hostivice

IČO 00241237

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce sokolovny Hostivice.
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
19
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace Litovického potoka v k.ú.Hostivice II.
Výstavba vodních děl
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce povrchu komunikace ulice Jiráskova a Železničářů v Hostivici
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení kompostérů pro město Hostivice Systém odděleného sběru bioodpadů ve městě Hostivice
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
1
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce sokolovny Hostivice - vícepráce
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Psk - Průmyslové stavby a konstrukce, a.s.
2 16,206,081
Zvánovec a.s.
1 9,064,908
Strabag a.s.
2 5,408,648
První Chráněná Dílna s.r.o.
1 2,799,000
Elkoplast Cz, s.r.o.
2 1,155,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce sokolovny Hostivice - vícepráce
Not disclosed
- 1,697,931
Rekonstrukce povrchu komunikace ulice Jiráskova a Železničářů v Hostivici - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
- 71,979

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 50% (4 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

65%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 25% (2 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 38% (3 from 8)