Small cities • 2016

Město Brušperk

IČO 00296538

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Plavecký bazén Brušperk II
Výstavba jednoúčelových sportovních zařízení
7
Ø4 in industry
Snížení emisí základní školy Vojtěcha Martínka v Brušperku
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
DODATEK Č. 1 - Snížení emisí základní školy Vojtěcha Martínka v Brušperku
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Sběr, svoz, využití nebo odstranění komunálních odpadů vznikající na území města Brušperku
Odvoz odpadu
5
Ø4 in industry
Sběr, svoz, využití nebo odstranění komunálních odpadů vznikající na území města Brušperku
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pss Přerovská stavební a.s.
1 43,239,983
Aqua - Gas, s.r.o.
2 17,714,294
Marius Pedersen a.s.
2 7,825,581

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
DODATEK Č. 1 - Snížení emisí základní školy Vojtěcha Martínka v Brušperku
Not disclosed
8,836,156

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 40% (2 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

56%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 40% (2 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 40% (2 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)