Small cities • 2016

Obec Velký Osek

IČO 00235873

The competition for contracts is low. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

14%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
2. etapa podtlakové kanalizace Velký Osek
Kanalizace
3
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ Velký Osek
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ Velký Osek
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Dukelských Hrdinů v obci Velký Osek
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
9
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy MŠ Velký Osek
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Geosan Stavební a.s.
1 56,999,999
Starkon a.s.
5 28,748,491
Strabag a.s.
2 10,237,460
A-tec servis s.r.o.
1 4,045,000
Halko stavební společnost, s.r.o.
1 2,469,051

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 50% (1 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 40% (4 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

61%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 40% (4 from 10)