Small cities • 2016

Město Hluk

IČO 00290939

The competition for contracts is high. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Energeticky úsporná opatření sportovní hala Hluk
Rekonstrukce budov
8
Ø5 in industry
Přístavba a nástavba kina
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce centrální části města Hluk
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
4
Ø6 in industry
Bezbariérové chodníky Hluk I. a II. etapa
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Výběr dodavatele tepla pro město Hluk a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Energetické a související služby
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pozemní stavitelství Zlín a.s.
1 24,451,350
Zess, a.s.
1 12,445,331
Tufír, spol. s r.o.
4 11,806,260
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-cz s.r.o.
1 9,149,653
Ing. Jan Svatoň
1 1,340,483

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce centrální části města Hluk – vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
- 1,220,788
Rekonstrukce centrální části města Hluk – vícepráce - přeložky
Dodatečné práce
- 665,940
Rekonstrukce centrální části města Hluk – vícepráce - sanace
Dodatečné práce
- 519,582

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

72%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 12% (1 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 12% (1 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 50% (4 from 8)