Small cities • 2016

Město Lázně Kynžvart

IČO 00254029

Good buyer. Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Suppliers do not show much risk factors - "red flags".

24.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření parkovacích míst Dlouhá, Krátká
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry
Rozšíření parkovacích míst, ulice Polní
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry
Ulice Luční (I. a II. etapa)
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry
Ulice K Rybníku - obytná zóna
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení imisní zátěže v Lázních Kynžvart
Motorová vozidla
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 10,499,815
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
2 6,097,383
Silnice Horšovský Týn a. s.
1 3,180,000
Tomáš Mikeš
2 3,148,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (4 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 33% (2 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)