Small cities • 2016

Obec Vejprnice

IČO 00258474

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

80%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
NÁSTAVBA NA STÁVAJÍCÍM OBJEKTU ZŠ VE VEJPRNICÍCH
Stavební úpravy školních budov
10
Ø5 in industry
Vejprnice - napojení MK na komunikace II. a III. třídy
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
11
Ø5 in industry
NÁSTAVBA NA STÁVAJÍCÍ OBJEKT ZÁKLADNÍ ŠKOLY VE VEJPRNICÍCH - dodatek č. 1
Stavební úpravy školních budov
1
Ø5 in industry
ZATEPLENÍ ZŠ A MŠ VEJPRNICE
Tepelné izolace
10
Ø6 in industry
„Provozování sběrného dvora ve Vejprnicích“
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Smp Cz, a.s.
2 32,823,560
Bp Stavby Cz s.r.o.
1 9,553,339
Plzeňské Stavitelství Psv Plus s.r.o.
3 7,338,667
Eko-separ, s. r. o.
1 3,047,988
Tomáš Mikeš
1 2,898,000
Other suppliers 4 5,421,397

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

62%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
NÁSTAVBA NA STÁVAJÍCÍ OBJEKT ZÁKLADNÍ ŠKOLY VE VEJPRNICÍCH - dodatek č. 1
Not disclosed
6,860,561

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

8%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (3 from 12)