Small cities • 2016

Město Brtnice

IČO 00285668

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
BRTNICE - NIVA II, KOMUNIKACE A INŽENÝRSKÉ SÍTĚ PRO 27 RD
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
6
Ø6 in industry
BRTNICE - NIVA místní komunikace a inženýrské sítě stavba 1 km 0,360 00-0,740 60
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
9
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce DPS Na Podmoklí Brtnice – energetické úspory
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Zkvalitnění nakládání s odpady v obci Brtnice
Vozidla na odpadky
3
Ø3 in industry
Moderní digitální výukové centrum v ZŠ Brtnice
Nábytek (včetně kancelářského), zařízení interiéru, domácí spotřebiče (mimo osvětlení) a čisticí prostředky
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

26%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 28,171,947
Vlastimil Zelený
1 3,905,103
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 2,939,500
Kdz, spol. s r. o.
1 2,411,613
Enwox Energy s.r.o.
1 2,002,185
Other suppliers 1 1,938,400

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

82%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)