Small cities • 2016

Obec Orlické Záhoří

IČO 00275204

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Suppliers do not show much risk factors - "red flags".

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

66%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Ochrana vod na území Sudet - stavební práce
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
13
Ø5 in industry
Modernizace integrovaného záchranného systému Orlických a Bystřických hor v souvislosti se vstupem do Shengenského prostoru - dodávka cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro Obec Orlické Záhoří
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
Zkvalitnění systému separace odpadů v obci Orlické Záhoří
Vozidla pro svoz odpadků a odpadních vod
1
Ø3 in industry
Čistou řekou z Orlických hor do Labe - stavební práce
Výstavba čistíren odpadních vod
3
Ø4 in industry
Ochrana vod na území sudet - stavební práce - vícepráce
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
G-mont Cr s.r.o.
2 9,782,594
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 4,950,600
Fornal trading s.r.o.
1 3,694,574
Vodní zdroje Ekomonitor spol. s r.o.
2 2,300,831

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Ochrana vod na území sudet - stavební práce - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
1,626,575
Čistou řekou z Orlických hor do Labe - stavební práce - vícepráce
Dodatečné práce
355,157

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 50% (3 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)