Small cities • 2016

Město Jáchymov

IČO 00254622

The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace historického jádra města – prostranství u kostela sv. Jáchyma
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Opěrná zeď Mincovní ul., lokalita 28, 2. etapa
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Opěrná zeď Mincovní ul., lokalita 28, 1. Etapa
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace historického jádra města Jáchymov etapa I.C
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Prevence sesuvu svahů v Jáchymově - Malá Žižkova - lokalita 13
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Az Sanace a.s.
4 12,970,317
Algon, a.s.
1 9,965,347
Colas Cz, a.s.
1 9,227,234
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 7,679,189
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 4,551,107
Other suppliers 2 4,350,487

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

62%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 30% (3 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (2 from 10)