Small cities • 2016

Město Šlapanice

IČO 00282651

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Šlapanice
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Sanace a zajištění sesuvného tělesa ZŠ Šlapanice
Provádění vrtů
2
Ø3 in industry
Víceúčelový atletický areál ZŠ Šlapanice
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
3
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace návsi v Bedřichovicích-Bedřichovice nad temží
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
7
Ø5 in industry
Moderní elektronický úřad Šlapanice
Systémové a podpůrné služby
3
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos Brno, a.s.
1 69,798,876
Stump - Geospol s.r.o.
1 33,045,632
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
2 18,288,526
Tomireko, s.r.o.
1 11,500,000
C System Cz a.s.
1 5,619,111
Other suppliers 5 14,959,585

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

47%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 13%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 1.13

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 45% (5 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 18% (2 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 27% (3 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 18% (2 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 9% (1 from 11)