Small cities • 2016

Město Horní Planá

IČO 00245895

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

92%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Cyklistická stezka na levém břehu Lipenské vodní nádrže v úseku zastávka ČD Pernek - Horní Planá, kemp "U Kukačků".
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
7
Ø5 in industry
„Cyklistická stezka na levém břehu Lipenské vodní nádrže v úseku kemp „U Kukačků“ – Horní Planá – přívoz“.
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
20
Ø5 in industry
HORNÍ PLANÁ, PIHLOV – KANALIZACE A VODOVOD, 2. ETAPA
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
11
Ø5 in industry
„NÁJEM TEPELNÉHO HOSPODÁŘSTVÍ MĚSTA HORNÍ PLANÁ“
Pára, horká voda a související produkty
4
Ø1 in industry
Horní Planá – Regenerace veřejných prostranství, alejí a parků
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hochtief Cz a. s.
2 14,851,623
Lesostavby Třeboň a.s.
1 5,366,508
Veolia Energie Čr, a.s.
1 4,703,760
Green Project s.r.o.
1 1,259,583

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 50% (1 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)