Small cities • 2016

Město Krupka

IČO 00266418

The competition for contracts is low. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Krupka č.p. 32 – rekonstrukce pro MÚ
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Realizace úspor energií – ZŠ MARŠOV, Karla Čapka 270, Krupka
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Přestavba bývalé fary na hasičské muzeum, Husitská č.p. 93
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Obnova parku Herty Lindnerové Krupka
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní hala Krupka - realizace úspor energií
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Metrostav a.s.
7 46,328,043
Nepro stavební a.s.
2 35,715,937
Mature Teplice s.r.o.
5 23,381,894
Stavmart s.r.o.
7 20,243,158
Khl-eko, a.s.
4 10,419,696
Other suppliers 5 19,370,469

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 25% (1 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 30)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (8 from 30)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 30)
Missing supplier ID 10% (3 from 30)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 30)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 30)
Call and award notices contradict each other 3% (1 from 30)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 30)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

84%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 30)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 30)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (1 from 30)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (4 from 30)