Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Krupka

IČO 00266418

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MATURE TEPLICE s.r.o.
5 27,006,625
STAVMART s.r.o.
5 15,725,747
NEPRO stavební a.s.
1 12,885,716
HERKUL a.s.
1 9,004,877
KHL-EKO, a.s.
4 4,969,053
Other suppliers 12 13,724,421

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 33% (2 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 195,487,182
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 703,356,362
Total 898,843,544

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 32)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 32)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 32)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 32)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

24%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 52% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 29 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders