Small cities • 2016

Obec Bílovice nad Svitavou

IČO 00281581

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is low. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

45.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„V 00034 – revitalizace středu obce“
Práce pro kompletní nebo částečnou výstavbu inženýrské stavitelství
3
Ø5 in industry
Dopravní uzel IDS
Stavební práce na městské výstavbě
8
Ø5 in industry
„K 00071B – Rozšíření infrastruktury pro vzdělávání v Bílovicích nad Svitavou“
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro Obec Bílovice nad Svitavou
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
„V 00008 – kropicí vůz“
Vozidla silniční údržby
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Komfort,a.s.
1 44,400,000
Skanska a.s.
1 13,360,031
Cergomont s.r.o.
1 5,133,526
Tht Polička, s.r.o.
1 4,190,000
Nilfisk s.r.o.
1 2,829,010
Other suppliers 3 5,486,942

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 25% (2 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)