Small cities • 2016

Město Nové Hrady

IČO 00245267

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba a zkapacitnění místních komunikací v Nových Hradech, CZ.1.14/1.5.00/31.02989
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
8
Ø6 in industry
Výstavba a zkapacitnění místních komunikací v Nových Hradech, CZ.1.14/1.5.00/31.02989 - dodatečné stavební práce
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
1
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti Centra volnočasových aktivit v Nových Hradech
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
REKULTIVACE SKLÁDKY ODPADU JIŽNÍ MĚSTO NOVÉ HRADY, akceptační číslo: 11085644; CZ.1.02/4.1.00/11.11090
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
REGENERACE PANELOVÉHO SÍDLIŠTĚ NOVÉ HRADY – III. ETAPA
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
2 26,753,176
Tangenta, spol. s r.o.
2 14,443,966
Quail spol. s r.o.
1 5,997,599
Nilfisk s.r.o.
1 2,380,000
Marius Pedersen a.s.
2 3,761

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

29%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Výstavba a zkapacitnění místních komunikací v Nových Hradech, CZ.1.14/1.5.00/31.02989 - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 13,300,201

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (3 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

95%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 25% (2 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)