Small cities • 2016

Město Libochovice

IČO 00263931

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Suppliers do not show much risk factors - "red flags".

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Realizace energetických úspor ZŠ v Libochovicích
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor MŠ Revoluční
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace veřejných prostranství v místních částech Poplze a Dubany - Libochovice
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací včetně instalace mobiliáře
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení objektu DPS Libochovice
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metall Quatro spol. s r.o.
6 18,864,852
Havi s.r.o.
4 14,045,162
S-bau Bohemia spol. s r.o.
2 6,591,371
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 3,288,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 54% (7 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 13)