Small cities • 2016

Město Plesná

IČO 00254169

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení ZŠ Plesná, Školní 254
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úprava ulice Školní a parkování u ZŠ Plesná
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø6 in industry
Kulturní dům Plesná - 1.etapa rekonstrukce - turistické centrum
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Kulturní dům Plesná - 2.etapa rekonstrukce
Rekonstrukce budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Kompostování v obci Plesná
Kompostovače
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stavby Is, s.r.o.
3 21,783,355
Tercom s.r.o.
1 10,858,792
Elči s.r.o.
1 3,391,429
Colormax s.r.o.
1 3,227,019
Energreen Projekt s.r.o.
1 2,985,000
Other suppliers 2 2,114,222

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)