Small cities • 2016

Svazek vodovodů a kanalizací Tišnovsko

IČO 49457004

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Čebín - rekonstrukce kanalizace, obec Sentice - stoková síť
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
4
Ø5 in industry
Aglomerace Tišnov, rozšíření stokové sítě-stavba Železné, 2.etapa
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
4
Ø5 in industry
Tišnov "Za Mlýnem" - výstavba kanalizace a rekonstrukce komunikací
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
17
Ø5 in industry
Obec Šerkovice - Stoková síť
Kanalizace
10
Ø6 in industry
Čebín – rekonstrukce kanalizace, obec Sentice – stoková síť – dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

24%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos Brno, a.s.
3 130,634,953
Mertastav s.r.o.
3 91,703,641
Česká spořitelna, a.s.
1 2,051,311

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 29% (2 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 57% (4 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 7)