Small cities • 2016

Město Nasavrky

IČO 00270580

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nasavrky II. etapa, dostavba kanalizace
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací a centra města Nasavrky
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
4
Ø6 in industry
Kanalizační přípojky - Nasavrky II. etapa, dostavba kanalizace
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
7
Ø5 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření pro město Nasavrky
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace zeleně v městě Nasavrky
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

18%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kvis Pardubice a.s.
2 33,930,548
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 8,540,956
Tbo s.r.o.
1 2,350,421
Libor Mrázek
1 1,458,358

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Inovativni 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 5)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

65%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 60% (3 from 5)