Small cities • 2016

Město Kardašova Řečice

IČO 00246905

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Enough firms are competing for contracts.

32.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

43%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
1 22,159,781
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 5,087,934
Strabag a.s.
1 3,174,795
Ing.arch. Kouřimský Petr
1 3,000,000
Tomáš Mikeš
1 1,997,000
Other suppliers 4 4,442,874

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Inovativni 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 9)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 22% (2 from 9)