Small cities • 2016

Obec Tuchlovice

IČO 00235041

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Show average values  
46%
Bidder participation
9%
Winner concentration
0%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
100%
Consistent conduct
92%
Journal data quality
100%
Supplier rating

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

46%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
LÁNY - TUCHLOVICE - SRBY ZA PRACÍ NA KOLE
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
4
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy zdravotního střediska
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Domu služeb v obci Tuchlovice
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Obec Tuchlovice - sběr, svoz a nakládání s odpadem
Sběr tuhého městského odpadu
2
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy knihovny v obci Tuchlovice
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

9%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
 3 17,530,531
Sam spol. s r.o.
 1 1,829,866
Ave Kladno s.r.o.
 1 1,707,751

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 5)