Small cities • 2016

Městys Lázně Toušeň

IČO 00240893

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
REKONSTRUKCE MÍSTNÍCH KOMUNIKACÍ V LÁZNÍCH TOUŠEŇ - II. ETAPA
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE MÍSTNÍCH KOMUNIKACÍ V LÁZNÍCH TOUŠEŇ
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
„ROZŠÍŘENÍ A ZKVALITNĚNÍ KAPACIT MŠ NEHVIZDSKÁ LÁZNĚ TOUŠEŇ“
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Svoz bioodpadu v Lázních Toušeň - I. etapa
Vozidla na odpadky
3
Ø3 in industry
„Vybudování podzemních kontejnerů v městysi Lázně Toušeň“
Kontejnery a nádoby na odpad a odpadky
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
M - Silnice a.s.
1 25,999,122
Společnost T.a.q. s.r.o.
1 14,375,842
Rybář stavební s.r.o.
1 7,407,481
Unikont Group s.r.o.
2 4,426,000
Osk Praha s.r.o.
1 2,310,024
Other suppliers 1 1,986,686

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 43% (3 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 14% (1 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)