Small cities • 2016

Město Rumburk

IČO 00261602

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění komplexních služeb při nakládání s odpady na území města Rumburk
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø3 in industry
„ZŠ Tyršova Rumburk - rekonstrukce tělocvičny“
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Zimní údržba místních komunikací města Rumburk
Odklízení sněhu
3
Ø3 in industry
„Údržba a ošetřování vybrané veřejné zeleně ve městě Rumburk“
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø6 in industry
"Sdružené služby dodávek zemního plynu pro město Rumburk"
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
2 22,262,320
Wakos, s.r.o.
1 14,730,300
Ep Energy Trading, a.s.
2 4,898,678
Zeps s.r.o.
1 4,763,500
Amper Market, a.s.
2 4,009,057
Other suppliers 3 6,757,864

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Sdružené služby dodávek zemního plynu pro město Rumburk
Not disclosed
2,449,339
Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Rumburk
Not disclosed
1,607,194

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 9% (1 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 27% (3 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

70%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 36% (4 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)