Small cities • 2016

Město Horšovský Týn

IČO 00253383

The competition for contracts is high. Suppliers show significant risks of corruption or inefficiency.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

85%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Odkanalizování města Horšovský Týn, čát Horšov
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
11
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce Plzeňské ulice, Horšovský Týn - I., II. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
10
Ø5 in industry
Obytná zóna, Lidická ulice - I.etapa, Horšovský Týn - technická a dopravní infrastruktura
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
7
Ø6 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Horšovský Týn
Hlavní počítače
2
Ø2 in industry
Horšovský Týn, ZUŠ - půdní vestavba učeben
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pohl cz, a.s.
1 7,292,626
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 5,870,251
Silnice Horšovský Týn a. s.
1 4,448,000
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 3,421,400
Stafiko stav s.r.o.
1 2,299,099
Other suppliers 2 2,774,327

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 50%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 7)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

62%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 14% (1 from 7)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 29% (2 from 7)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 7)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (1 from 7)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 14% (1 from 7)