Small cities • 2016

Město Plasy

IČO 00258245

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Plasy. Cesty klášterem - stezky k poznání
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Plasy - místní komunikace, část Střelnice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
14
Ø5 in industry
Snížení prašnosti ve městě Plasy
Zametací vozy s vysavačem
4
Ø3 in industry
Základní škola Plasy - výměna oken v pavilonech P1, P2 a CH
Instalace oken
8
Ø5 in industry
Plasy. Cesty klášterem - stezky k poznání - dodatečné stavební práce II.
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Hochtief Cz a. s.
4 15,012,365
Henstav s.r.o.
1 7,736,878
Unikont Group s.r.o.
1 3,079,000
Window Holding a.s.
1 2,432,262
Arborea Rakovník s.r.o.
1 329,953

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

69%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Plasy. Cesty klášterem - stezky k poznání - dodatečné stavební práce II.
Dodatečné práce
1,549,788
Plasy. Cesty klášterem - stezky k poznání - dodatečné stavební práce III.
Dodatečné práce
529,574
Plasy. Cesty klášterem - stezky k poznání - dodatečné stavební práce I.
Dodatečné práce
410,951

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 62% (5 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (2 from 8)