Small cities • 2016

Město Vodňany

IČO 00251984

The competition for contracts is high. Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

99%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Inženýrské sítě pro stavební parcely ve Vodňanech Na Kameni - 1. etapa
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy multifunkčního objektu v areálu Blanice ve Vodňanech
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Základní škola a Gymnázium Vodňany - zateplení
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti provozu polikliniky - Vodňany
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací - lokalita č. 1, 3 a 4
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
9
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zvánovec a.s.
1 15,287,736
Proteren s.r.o.
1 11,853,950
Jindřich Parus, voda-plyn-topení spol. s r.o.
1 10,888,840
Š + H Bohunice, s.r.o.
1 8,221,803
Sam silnice a mosty a.s.
1 7,067,981
Other suppliers 5 10,807,950

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.20

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 20% (2 from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 10% (1 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (2 from 10)