Small cities • 2016

Obec Dalovice

IČO 00573213

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dokončení I. etapy společenského objektu Dalovice
Výstavba víceúčelových budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Společenský objekt Dalovice
Výstavba víceúčelových budov
6
Ø4 in industry
Společenský objekt Dalovice - 2. etapa, stavební práce dle opčního práva
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Dalovice - regenerace zámeckého parku
Zahradnické služby
3
Ø6 in industry
Dalovice - rekonstrukce části ulice Letní
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Engada Europe a.s.
3 27,823,910
Algon, a.s.
4 25,035,633
Petr Vykrut
1 3,185,323
Stavební společnost Jaroslav Oršuliak, a.s.
1 2,845,688
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 2,664,994

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (2 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

52%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 10)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 10)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 10)