Small cities • 2016

Město Žirovnice

IČO 00249505

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is low.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Žirovnice – modernizace úpravny vody“
Výstavba úpraven pitné vody
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Nádražní - Žirovnice
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
27
Ø6 in industry
Kompostárna Žirovnice – stavební práce
Výstavba kompostovacích zařízení
3
Ø5 in industry
Žirovnice - ZTV Sídliště
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
11
Ø6 in industry
Zajištění energetických úspor ZŠ Žirovnice
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Vhz-dis, spol. s r.o.
1 28,486,804
Radouňská vodohospodářská společnost, a.s.
1 9,826,642
I.kamenická stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
2 6,176,694
Jindřichohradecké Montáže s.r.o.
1 5,842,576
Agos stavební a.s. Pelhřimov
2 5,689,327
Other suppliers 2 5,313,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Kompostárna Žirovnice – stavební práce – vícepráce
Not disclosed
282,863
Zajištění energetických úspor ZŠ Žirovnice - vícepráce (JŘbU)
Not disclosed
Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

71%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 9)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 9)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (1 from 9)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (1 from 9)