Small cities • 2016

Město Hulín

IČO 00287229

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

157.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

43%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Regenerace náměstí Míru v Hulíně
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
„Svoz směsného komunálního odpadu a provozování sběrného dvora ve městě Hulín“
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry
Svoz směsného komunálního odpadu a provozování sběrného dvora ve městě Hulín
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
4
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení budovy Kulturního klubu v Hulíně
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Lesopark "NIVKY"
Zahradnické služby
15
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Rovina, a.s.
1 21,351,233
Biopas, spol. s r.o.
3 9,913,703
Proving s.r.o.
1 3,589,000
H - Rekultivace, a.s.
1 3,315,107

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
„Svoz směsného komunálního odpadu a provozování sběrného dvora ve městě Hulín - JŘBU“
Krajní naléhavost
398,329

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (2 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

74%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 6)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 6)
Supplier donating to political party 17% (1 from 6)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 6)