Small cities • 2016

Město Tovačov

IČO 00302082

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Pamítková obnova Spanilé věže zámku Tovačov
Výstavba historických památek a památníků
3
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení objektu městské víceúčelové haly v Tovačově
Tepelné izolace
3
Ø6 in industry
Zateplení objektu městské víceúčelové haly v Tovačově
Tepelné izolace
3
Ø6 in industry
Komplexní revitalizace Tovačov-lokalita Jiráskova
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
1
Ø5 in industry
Varovný a vyrozumívací systém obcí Tovačov, Troubky a Lobodice
Systémy pro veřejný rozhlas
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavební společnost Navrátil, s.r.o.
2 9,086,166
Ptáček - pozemní stavby s.r.o.
1 8,044,726
Strabag a.s.
1 4,343,776
Empemont s.r.o.
1 3,374,985

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 50% (1 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

14%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 60% (3 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 80% (4 from 5)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 5)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 5)
Supplier donating to political party 20% (1 from 5)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 20% (1 from 5)