Small cities • 2018

Obec Jirny

IČO 00240257

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

0%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Novostavba základní školy, tělocvičny, parkovací plochy a přípojek v obci Jirny
Výstavba základních škol
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace v ul. Cyrilovská "Nové Jirny"
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
2
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací Jirny
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Zlínstav a.s.
1 79,162,302
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 79,162,302
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
1 79,162,302
STRABAG a.s.
2 12,660,213

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 270,044,107
Unregulated purchases -258,730,833
Total 11,313,274

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

0%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 1.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.20 (average mistakes per contract)