Small cities • 2018

Obec Zdiby

IČO 00241032

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex
Show average values  
42%
Bidder participation
69%
Winner concentration
50%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
67%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
0%
Buyer profile data quality

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Rozšíření kanalizace a ČOV Zdiby
Sewer construction work
7
Ø7 in industry
Vybudování nástavby ZŠ na budově MŠ - Zdiby
Construction work for school buildings
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v obci Zdiby
Road construction works
7
Ø8 in industry
Nákup svozového vozu a kontejnerů na Bio odpad pro obec Zdiby
Specialist vehicles
2
Ø2 in industry
Oprava povrchu částí místních komunikací ul. Na Lada, Za Sokolovnou a Severní
Carriageway resurfacing works
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POHL cz, a.s.
 1 21,493,065
EKOLOGICKÁ STAVEBNÍ KRÁLŮV DVŮR s.r.o.
 1 21,493,065
GEOSAN GROUP a.s.
 1 21,493,065
Auböck s.r.o.
 1 18,194,561
TREPART s.r.o.
 1 18,194,561
Other suppliers 4 11,288,611

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 128,193,363
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 86,618,578

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (2 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.83 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders