Small cities • 2018

Město Chlumec

IČO 00391387

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

9%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce objektů Kulturního střediska města Chlumec - II. etapa
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektů Kulturního střediska města Chlumec – 1. etapa
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení cisternové automobilové stříkačky
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Nad Školou
Práce na opravě silnic
2
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce VO ve městě Chlumec – výměna svítidel
Elektrické zdroje světla a svítidla
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Studio Jelínek s. r. o.
2 34,699,111
PRŮMSTAV, a.s.
1 26,499,112
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 4,788,000
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 2,784,974
ELTODO-CITELUM, s.r.o.
1 1,786,227

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 75,354,824
Unregulated purchases 32,991,607
Total 108,346,431

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 20% (1 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.80 (average mistakes per contract)