Small cities • 2018

Město Suchdol nad Lužnicí

IČO 00247561

Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

19.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

92%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
B.j. 22 PB-PČB Suchdol nad Lužnicí
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
SUCHDOL NAD LUŽNICÍ – NAPOJENÍ OSADY KLIKOV NA VEŘEJNOU KANALIZACI
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
17
Ø7 in industry
SUCHDOL NAD LUŽNICÍ – NAPOJENÍ OSADY TUŠŤ NA VEŘEJNOU KANALIZACI
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
16
Ø7 in industry
SUCHDOL NAD LUŽNICÍ – NAPOJENÍ OSADY FRANTIŠKOV NA VEŘEJNOU KANALIZACI
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
24
Ø7 in industry
Modernizace místních komunikací v Suchdole nad Lužnicí
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Radouňská vodohospodářská společnost, a.s.
2 42,413,844
Auböck s.r.o.
1 34,644,668
Metrostav a.s.
1 26,490,818
VIALIT SOBĚSLAV spol. s r.o.
1 6,870,034
Lesostavby Třeboň a.s.
1 6,613,511
Other suppliers 4 13,275,719

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 145,339,172
Unregulated purchases -66,192,004
Total 79,147,167

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

81%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)