Small cities • 2018

Město Lišov

IČO 00245178

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. The competition for contracts is high.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy a zateplení kulturního domu v Lišově
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
4
Ø4 in industry
„Stavební úpravy MK, chodníků, přístupů k domům a veřejného osvětlení ulic Čechova a Úzká“
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Napojení místní části Hůrky na vodovodní řad města Lišov
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
14
Ø7 in industry
Dodávka velkokapacitní CAS pro JSDH Lišov
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Výstavba jednostranného chodníku v obci Lhotice
Stavební úpravy chodníků
6
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MANE STAVEBNÍ s.r.o.
1 19,769,968
AKORD stavební a obchodní společnost, spol. s r.o.
1 10,448,200
ALSTAP s.r.o.
1 6,348,110
SPS - VKP s.r.o.
1 6,173,000
K-BUILDING CB, a.s.
1 5,234,567
Other suppliers 7 17,684,387

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 89,684,922
Unregulated purchases 41,980,383
Total 131,665,306

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Oprava chodníků při silnici I/34, Lišov - vícepráce
Additional works
305,324

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 17% (2 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

2%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 36% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.36 (average mistakes per contract)