Small cities • 2018

Město Jistebnice

IČO 00252425

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Božejovice – kanalizace a ČOV
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
7
Ø7 in industry
B.j. 6 PB - PČB Jistebnice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Obnova zastaralé techniky u hasičů v Jistebnici
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
Jistebnice - nový vodní zdroj pro Hůrku u Jistebnice
Výstavba úpraven vody
7
Ø5 in industry
Systém odděleného sběru pro město Jistebnice
Zdvihací a manipulační zařízení
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

36%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 21,728,551
STATUS stavební a.s.
1 7,838,838
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,222,000
AGROZET České Budějovice, a.s.
1 2,324,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Inovativni 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

89%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 52,833,152
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 13,397,342
Total 66,230,494

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Final or estimated price not published 20% (1 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 20% (1 from 5)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 20% (1 from 5)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 5)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu 5 zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek