Small cities • 2018

Obec Sulice

IČO 00240818

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

43%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRADAST, spol. s r.o.
1 23,580,799
MOBIKO plus a.s.
1 20,000,000
KOMA MODULAR s.r.o.
2 11,135,050
Zahradní architektura Martinov s.r.o.
3 1,432,632

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 60,501,481
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 9,163,181

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
NOVÉ ZALOŽENÍ A ČÁSTEČNÁ OBNOVA PAMÁTNÉHO PARKU U ROZHLEDNY APAMÁTNÍKU NA KŘÍŽKÁCH II – DODATEČNÉ SLUŽBY
Additional works
- 110,780
NOVÉ ZALOŽENÍ A ČÁSTEČNÁ OBNOVA PAMÁTNÉHO PARKU U ROZHLEDNY APAMÁTNÍKU NA KŘÍŽKÁCH II – DODATEČNÉ SLUŽBY II
Additional works
- 47,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

17%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 2.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 11% (1 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

19%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 44% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders