Small cities • 2018

Město Soběslav

IČO 00252921

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy domu č.p. 1 na náměstí Republiky v Soběslavi
Stavební úpravy uměleckých a kulturních budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunikace a inženýrské sítě pro RD "U sídliště Svákov" - Soběslav, 2. etapa
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Přístavba a stavební úpravy sportovní haly Soběslav
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
13
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace jižní části náměstí Republiky v Soběslavi – stavební úpravy – 3. etapa
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Chlebov - kanalizace a stabilizační nádrže
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
18
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

42%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
2 25,035,065
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 13,161,497
KAVEX Bohemia s.r.o.
1 6,715,413
Lesostavby Třeboň a.s.
1 4,872,209

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 60% (3 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 52,475,170
Unregulated purchases 297,697,027
Total 350,172,197

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

40%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.40 (average mistakes per contract)