Small cities • 2018

Město Pyšely

IČO 00240664

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

27.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Rekonstrukce, přístavba a nástavba základní školy T.G.Masaryka“
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací v Pyšelích, Zaječicích, Kovářovicích a Nové Vsi
Práce na opravě silnic
2
Ø6 in industry
"Rekonstrukce místních komunikací města Pyšely"
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
Nákup velkokapacitní požární cisterny na dopravu vody
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
"Realizace úspor energie ZŠ T.G.M. Pyšely"
Stavební úpravy školních budov
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STATUS stavební a.s.
2 51,361,160
B E S s.r.o.
2 28,631,194
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,669,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 87,574,363
Unregulated purchases -75,219,495
Total 12,354,868

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

95%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)