Small cities • 2018

Město Pyšely

IČO 00240664

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
„Rekonstrukce, přístavba a nástavba základní školy T.G.Masaryka“
Construction work for school buildings
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace místních komunikací v Pyšelích, Zaječicích, Kovářovicích a Nové Vsi
Road-repair works
Ø6 in industry
"Rekonstrukce místních komunikací města Pyšely"
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø7 in industry
Nákup velkokapacitní požární cisterny na dopravu vody
Water-tender vehicles
Ø2 in industry
"Realizace úspor energie ZŠ T.G.M. Pyšely"
Construction work for school buildings
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STATUS stavební a.s.
2 51,361,160
B E S s.r.o.
2 28,631,194
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,669,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 87,574,363
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 12,354,868

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 5 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders