Small cities • 2018

Město Potštát

IČO 00301795

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. The competition for contracts is low.

78.
ranking
69%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

18%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/441 křiž. R35 – hr. kraje Moravskoslezského
Stavební úpravy při rekonstrukci mostů
5
Ø8 in industry
POTŠTÁT – LIPNÁ, VODOVOD
Stavební práce
12
Ø5 in industry
Energetické úspory objektu tělocvičny u ZŠ v Potštátě
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
FZŠ – Potštát – Cisternová automobilová stříkačka
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
1
Ø2 in industry
Zavedení separace a svozu bioodpadů ve městě Potštát
Motorová vozidla
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

39%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 66,464,939
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o., odštěpný závod Dopravní stavby MORAVA
1 66,464,939
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 7,882,400
THERM, spol. s r. o.
1 5,725,502
WISS CZECH, s.r.o.
1 5,094,900
Other suppliers 1 2,299,900

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 242,903,949
Unregulated purchases -204,221,080
Total 38,682,869

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.83 (average mistakes per contract)