Small cities • 2018

Město Teplá

IČO 00255050

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Město Teplá – sídliště Školní – stavební práce
Stavební práce
15
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení techniky pro lesní hospodářství - město Teplá
Traktory
1
Ø2 in industry
Protipovodňová opatření pro město Teplá
Prevence záplav
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

23%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SILNICE CHMELÍŘ s.r.o.
1 16,361,647
Agroobchod-sever, s.r.o.
1 3,493,000
EMPEMONT s.r.o.
1 2,185,082
3x N spol. s r.o
2 1,386,314

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 31,815,356
Unregulated purchases 80,161,422
Total 111,976,778

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

78%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu DPS v Teplé - dodatečné stavební práce č. 1
Additional works
1,164,888
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu DPS v Teplé - dodatečné stavební práce č. 2
Additional works
221,426

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 33%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

25%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)