Small cities • 2018

Obec Nivnice

IČO 00291170

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. The competition for contracts is high.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
ZTV ulice Nábřežní, Nivnice
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Sportovní areál Nivnice II. etapa
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Nivnice silnice III/4981
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø7 in industry
SPORTOVNÍ AREÁL NIVNICE 2016 ET. 1: STAV. ÚPR. STÁV. FOTBALOVÉHO HŘIŠTĚ
Stavební úpravy sportovních zařízení
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

34%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MITES s.r.o.
2 14,620,184
DISKET, s.r.o.
1 5,899,869
KKS, spol. s r.o.
1 5,238,711

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 44,795,116
Unregulated purchases 47,492,634
Total 92,287,750

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

69%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.75

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

33%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)