City parts • 2018

Městská část Praha-Zbraslav

IČO 00241857

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření Základní školy Vladislava Vančury, Nad Parkem 1180, Praha - Zbraslav
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce lesoparku Belveder
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
MČ Praha - Zbraslav – Dodávka cisternového hasičského vozu pro JSDH
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
2
Ø2 in industry
ZŠ Vladislava Vančury, Praha - Zbraslav - Dodávka vnitřního vybavení
Nábytek
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

23%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
2 56,148,931
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 14,624,975
KOBIT, spol. s r.o.
1 6,445,000
DRUTĚVA, výrobní družstvo
2 4,251,870

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 50% (2 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

75%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 2.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Final or estimated price not published 33% (3 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 9)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 11% (1 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)