Small cities • 2018

Město Protivín

IČO 00250023

Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Odkanalizování místní části Myšenec
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Průtah městem Protivín – I. etapa Mírová ul. – Vodohospodářské objekty
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Protivín - rekonstrukce ulice B. Němcové a Na Chmelničkách
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Pořízení požární cisterny pro jednotku SDH Protivín
Water-tender vehicles
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v Protivíně
Construction work
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Š+H Bohunice, s.r.o.
7 52,868,823
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,179,900
S A P. spol. s r.o.
1 2,877,000
UCHYTIL s.r.o.
1 2,345,789

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 86,783,054
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 88,799,858
Total 175,582,912

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Protivín - rekonstrukce ul. Fučíkova a Ve Školce
Outside directive scope
- 6,748,165

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 36% (4 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 9% (1 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 9% (1 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.82 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders