Small cities • 2018

Město Rosice

IČO 00282481

The competition for contracts is low. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Podpora předškolního vzdělávání v Rosicích - Rekonstrukce MŠ Smetanova Rosice
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Novostavba MŠ Smetanova
Stavební práce
15
Ø5 in industry
Zvýšení připravenosti JSDH Rosice k řešení rizik vyplývajících z extrémního sucha.
Hasičská vozidla
1
Ø2 in industry
Plovárna Rosice
Architektonické, stavební, technické a inspekční služby
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
4 11,297,313
VAŠSTAV, s.r.o.
1 9,749,203
Hrušecká stavební spol. s r.o.
1 9,749,203
ATOS, spol. s r.o. Ledeč nad Sázavou
1 7,706,045
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,460,000
Other suppliers 2 1,229,900

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

52%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 62,351,014
Unregulated purchases 166,358,064
Total 228,709,078

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Digitální úřední deska – MěÚ Rosice
Outside directive scope
699,900

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 29% (2 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.29 (average mistakes per contract)