Small cities • 2018

Město Staňkov

IČO 00253766

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

27.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

93%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Staňkovsko - odkanalizování obcí na ČOV Staňkov a dokanalizování Staňkova – III. etapa, IV.etapa – odkanalizování Vránova
Stavební materiály a příbuzné prvky
10
Ø3 in industry
Lávka přes řeku Radbuzu
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
11
Ø5 in industry
ŘEŠENÍ CYKLODOPRAVY VE MĚSTĚ STAŇKOV A V JEHO MÍSTNÍCH ČÁSTECH
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
5
Ø5 in industry
Staňkov – Místní komunikace k Bílému Mlýnu
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø7 in industry
Vybudování varovného a výstražného systému ochrany před povodněmi pro město Staňkov
Prevence záplav
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

14%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mamelom, s.r.o.
1 108,995,398
HABAU CZ s.r.o.
1 9,254,666
SILNICE CHMELÍŘ s.r.o.
1 5,651,255
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 5,299,532
PRVNÍ CHRÁNĚNÁ DÍLNA s.r.o.
2 2,852,418
Other suppliers 4 6,672,667

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 143,074,316
Unregulated purchases -34,390,490
Total 108,683,826

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

41%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 63% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.88 (average mistakes per contract)