City parts • 2018

Městská část Praha 16

IČO 00241598

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

31%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
KRYTÝ BAZÉN PRAHA 16 - RADOTÍN
Single-purpose sports facilities construction work
2
Ø3 in industry
Hasičská zbrojnice Radotín
Fire station construction work
7
Ø6 in industry
„ZŠ Loučanská – vestavba školní auly do atria budovy ZŠ a nástavba sborovny“
Primary school construction work
1
Ø5 in industry
Přístavba základní školy - Stavební úpravy ZŠ Loučanská 1112/3

14
Ø5 in industry
Dovybavení JSDH Radotín - nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky CAS 30
Water-tender vehicles
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

40%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ALBET stavební, s.r.o.
2 82,574,363
CETUS PLUS, a.s.
1 27,564,003
ARENT VT, s.r.o.
1 9,856,672
Ekologické a inženýrské stavby, spol. s r.o.
2 7,721,782
THT Polička, s.r.o.
1 6,398,000
Other suppliers 3 12,291,992

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

95%
average 88%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
VEŘEJNÁ ZAKÁZKA NA STAVEBNÍ ČINNOSTI – DODATEČNÉ STAVEBNÍ PRÁCE: „MÍSTO U ŘEKY - RADOTÍN“
Previous tender without bids
- 1,779,782

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

51%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (1 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 50% (5 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders