Small cities • 2018

Obec Veřovice

IČO 00298531

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Kanalizace a ČOV obce Veřovice
Sewer construction work
Ø7 in industry
Vodovodní řady pro dolní část obce Verovice
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Víceúčelový dům v obci Veřovice
Houses construction work
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba, nástavba a stavební úpravy šatních kabin sportovního areálu
Restoration work
Ø4 in industry
„Manažer projektu – Kanalizace a ČOV obce Veřovice“
Business and management consultancy and related services
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SYNER VHS Vysočina, a.s.
1 86,446,769
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 86,446,769
POHL cz, a.s., odštěpný závod Opava
1 29,721,777
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
3 25,057,789
1 3,699,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (1 from 1)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 240,887,943
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 5,137,206

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Přístavba, nástavba a stavební úpravy šatních kabin sportovního areálu - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
- 92,855

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders