Small cities • 2018

Obec Veřovice

IČO 00298531

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kanalizace a ČOV obce Veřovice
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
3
Ø7 in industry
Vodovodní řady pro dolní část obce Verovice
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Víceúčelový dům v obci Veřovice
Výstavba domů
5
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba, nástavba a stavební úpravy šatních kabin sportovního areálu
Rekonstrukce budov
13
Ø4 in industry
„Manažer projektu – Kanalizace a ČOV obce Veřovice“
Podnikatelské a manažerské poradenství a související služby
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SYNER VHS Vysočina, a.s.
1 86,446,769
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 86,446,769
POHL cz, a.s., odštěpný závod Opava
1 29,721,777
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
3 25,057,789
AP INVESTING, s.r.o.
1 3,699,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 240,887,943
Unregulated purchases -235,750,736
Total 5,137,206

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Přístavba, nástavba a stavební úpravy šatních kabin sportovního areálu - dodatečné stavební práce
Additional works
92,855

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 6)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.33 (average mistakes per contract)