Small cities • 2018

Obec Mnichov

IČO 00254096

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts

Produkty zemědělství, hospodářské produkty, produkty akvakultury, lesnictví a související produkty
Ø3 in industry

Produkty zemědělství, hospodářské produkty, produkty akvakultury, lesnictví a související produkty
Ø3 in industry
Oprava místních komunikací v Mnichově - komunikace Okály
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace v Mnichově pošta - obchod
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Dodávka užitkového automobilu Toyota Proace Combi
Osobní vozidla
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PROVOD - inženýrská společnost, s.r.o.
1 1,432,000
Silnice Horšovský Týn a.s.
2 851,000
Werner Hüttner
1 754,213
Auto Eder s.r.o.
1 413,000
Jaroslav Čech LESOTECH
1 228,000
Other suppliers 1 200,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 40% (2 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 3,878,213
Unregulated purchases 605,101
Total 4,483,314

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 43% (3 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 14% (1 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 43% (3 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 29% (2 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)